1/8/2023 0 Comments Spamassassin not working![]() 0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signatureĠ.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily validģ.0 DCC_CHECK Gevonden in DCC ( Distributed Checksum Clearinghouses)ġ.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNSĠ.0 FSL_BULK_SIG Bulk signature with no UnsubscribeĢ.0 DKIMWL_BL DKIMwl. 0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's When checking again via CLI I get 31.9 points vs 4.4 in mail:Īnalyse details: (31.9 punten, 5.0 vereist)ġ0 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBLġ0 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSSĢ.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBLģ.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklistĠ.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML opgenomen in het berichtĠ.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML tekstkleur lijkt er op de Code: rootcp /etc/init. cf files in /etc/mail/spamassassin that should not be there. If you run this on your system ( spamassassin -lint), it will throw errors. You can search for this topic on the new forum: Search for Spamassassin not working, missing archive-iterator on the new forum. The key segment of the error message is the ''spamassassin -lint' check failed' line. X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,LOTS_OF_MONEY,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 These forums are locked and archived, but all topics have been migrated to the new forum. But when I check the same message (spamassassin -d -t < path.to.file) the score is way higher then what the headers show me. ![]() Lots of obvious spam messages get through.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |